From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. Nicholas

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 9, 2008
261 F. App'x 471 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-1472.

Submitted: December 7, 2007.

Decided: January 9, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:04-cv-02039-WDQ).

David A. Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph B. Spillman, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland; Christopher Coles Taub, Office of the Attorney General, Augusta, Maine, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


David A. Roberts appeals the district court's order granting Defendants' Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Roberts v. Nicholas, No. 1:04-cv-02039-WDQ (D.Md. Jan. 26, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Roberts v. Nicholas

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 9, 2008
261 F. App'x 471 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Roberts v. Nicholas

Case Details

Full title:David A. ROBERTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John NICHOLAS, individually and…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jan 9, 2008

Citations

261 F. App'x 471 (4th Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

Roberts v. Maine Dep't of Health & Human Servs.

David A. ROBERTS, petitioner, v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al.Case below, 261…

Hawks v. Abbott

Such alleged lawful collection measures on child support arrearages do not amount to constitutional…