From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. Narcissus Boutique, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 26, 1979
72 A.D.2d 808 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Opinion

November 26, 1979


In a consolidated action, inter alia, for declaratory and injunctive relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from stated portions of (1) an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered April 28, 1978 which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and dismissed the defendant's counterclaim and (2) an order of the same court, dated September 18, 1978, which, inter alia, in part denied the defendant's motion which was denominated as one to reargue but was in fact a motion to renew. Order and judgment entered April 28, 1978 and order dated September 18, 1978, reversed insofar as appealed from, defendant's motion for renewal granted, and, upon renewal, the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment is denied and the defendant's counterclaim is reinstated. The appellant is awarded one bill of $50 costs and disbursements to cover both appeals. The presentation of an additional factual affidavit on the motion for "reargument" sufficed to make it a motion for renewal and an appeal lies from the denial of a motion to renew (see Seabrook Realty Corp. v 139 W. Mut. Assoc., 60 A.D.2d 821; 2A Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N Y Civ Prac, par 2221.03; vol 7, par 5701.24). In view of the triable issues of fact raised on the motion to renew, Special Term should have granted renewal, and upon renewal denied plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and reinstated the defendant's counterclaim. Rabin, J.P., Cohalan, Margett and Gibbons, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Roberts v. Narcissus Boutique, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 26, 1979
72 A.D.2d 808 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)
Case details for

Roberts v. Narcissus Boutique, Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:STANLEY ROBERTS et al., Doing Business under the Firm Name of CENTRE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 26, 1979

Citations

72 A.D.2d 808 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Citing Cases

Miocic v. Winters

In opposition, plaintiffs' counsel admitted his friendship with Dr. Burton, but contended that this would not…

Kirchmeyer v. Subramanian

Order reversed on the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: We find that, under the circumstances…