From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. Martel

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 13, 2011
No. CIV S-11-2057 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-2057 MCE EFB P.

September 13, 2011


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner without counsel, seeks a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).

Petitioner challenges a conviction in the Fresno County Superior Court and so this action should have been commenced in the district court in Fresno. E.D. Cal. Local Rule 120(d). The court will not rule on petitioner's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that:

1. This action is transferred to the district court in Fresno. See E.D. Cal. Local Rule 120(f).

2. The Clerk of Court shall assign a new case number.

3. All future filings shall bear the new case number and shall be filed at:

United States District Court
Eastern District of California
2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721


Summaries of

Roberts v. Martel

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 13, 2011
No. CIV S-11-2057 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Roberts v. Martel

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD LEE ROBERTS, Petitioner, v. MIKE MARTEL, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 13, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-11-2057 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2011)