From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. Kirschenbaum & Phillips, P.C.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 4, 2022
22 Civ. 3597 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. May. 4, 2022)

Opinion

22 Civ. 3597 (AT)

05-04-2022

DERRICK ROBERTS, Plaintiff, v. KIRSCHENBAUM & PHILLIPS, P.C., Defendant.


ORDER OF SERVICE

ANALISA TORRES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, paid the filing fees to commence this action.

The Clerk of Court is directed to issue a summons as to Defendant Kirschenbaum & Phillips, P.C. Plaintiff is directed to serve the summons and complaint on Defendant within 90 days of the issuance of the summons. If within those 90 days, Plaintiff has not either served Defendant or requested an extension of time to do so, the Court may dismiss the claims against Defendant under Rules 4 and 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to prosecute. SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Roberts v. Kirschenbaum & Phillips, P.C.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 4, 2022
22 Civ. 3597 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. May. 4, 2022)
Case details for

Roberts v. Kirschenbaum & Phillips, P.C.

Case Details

Full title:DERRICK ROBERTS, Plaintiff, v. KIRSCHENBAUM & PHILLIPS, P.C., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 4, 2022

Citations

22 Civ. 3597 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. May. 4, 2022)