Northington-Munger-Pratt Co. v. Farmers Gin c. Co., 119 Ga. 851 ( 47 S.E. 200, 100 ASR 210); Sanders v. Allen, 135 Ga. 173 ( 68 S.E. 1102); Broadwell v. Kiker, 28 Ga. App. 279 ( 111 S.E. 62). "Whether or not the seller could have delivered good title on the closing date is not a question which addresses itself to the validity of the contract." Goldgar v. North Fulton Realty Co., 106 Ga. App. 459, 460 ( 127 S.E.2d 189); Roberts v. J. L. Todd Auction Co., 120 Ga. App. 444, 445 ( 170 S.E.2d 862). Accordingly, we hold the absence of title at the time of the making of the contract does not provide the basis for a fraudulent conversion. The motion to dismiss Count 1 as failing to state a claim for relief should have been sustained.