From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. Hartford Ins. Co. of the Midwest

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 14, 2012
Case No. 12-10998 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 14, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 12-10998

11-14-2012

ROBERTS, et al, Plaintiff, v. HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST, Defendant.


HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH


ORDER STRIKING STIPULATION

On November 14, 2012, Plaintiffs' counsel filed a Stipulation to Extend Dates [Dkt. 16]. Pursuant to E.D. Mich. Local Rules Appendix ECF Rule 11(a), a proposed stipulation and order must be submitted as a Word or WordPerfect Document via the link under the Utilities section of CM/ECF. The stipulation at issue is not in compliance with the rule.

IT IS ORDERED, that the stipulation [Dkt. 16] is STRICKEN.

SO ORDERED. Dated: November 14, 2012

Flint, Michigan

___________

MARK A. GOLDSMITH

United States District Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court's ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on November 14, 2012.

___________

DEBORAH J. GOLTZ

Case Manager


Summaries of

Roberts v. Hartford Ins. Co. of the Midwest

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 14, 2012
Case No. 12-10998 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 14, 2012)
Case details for

Roberts v. Hartford Ins. Co. of the Midwest

Case Details

Full title:ROBERTS, et al, Plaintiff, v. HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 14, 2012

Citations

Case No. 12-10998 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 14, 2012)