From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. Fischer

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Jul 19, 2010
9:09-CV-0750 (LEK/ATB) (N.D.N.Y. Jul. 19, 2010)

Opinion

9:09-CV-0750 (LEK/ATB).

July 19, 2010


DECISION AND ORDER


This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on June 28, 2010, by the Honorable Andrew T. Baxter, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(c) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 49).

Within fourteen days after a party has been served with a copy of a Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation, the party "may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), in compliance with L.R. 72.1. No objections have been raised in the allotted time with respect to Magistrate Judge Baxter's Report-Recommendation. Furthermore, after examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 49) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further

ORDERED, that Defendant's Motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. No. 27) is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice as to Defendant Fischer; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Roberts v. Fischer

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Jul 19, 2010
9:09-CV-0750 (LEK/ATB) (N.D.N.Y. Jul. 19, 2010)
Case details for

Roberts v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM ROBERTS, Plaintiff, v. BRIAN FISCHER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Jul 19, 2010

Citations

9:09-CV-0750 (LEK/ATB) (N.D.N.Y. Jul. 19, 2010)