From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. Director, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 25, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-1633 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:13-cv-1633 KJM CKD P

2013-09-25

HASSAN ROBERTS, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, Respondent.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

On August 13, 2013, petitioner was ordered to file a request to proceed in forma pauperis or to pay the appropriate filing fee within thirty days. The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court's order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

_______________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Roberts v. Director, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 25, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-1633 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Roberts v. Director, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Case Details

Full title:HASSAN ROBERTS, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 25, 2013

Citations

No. 2:13-cv-1633 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2013)