Summary
In Roberts v. Philadelphia, 239 Pa. 339, 344, 86 A. 926, we held to be reversible error an instruction by the court from which "The jury could only have understood... that having seen the premises for themselves they were at liberty to substitute what they there saw for the evidence in the case...."
Summary of this case from Avins v. CommonwealthOpinion
No. 98 EAL 2019
08-12-2019
GRACE ROBERTS, Petitioner v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA TAX REVENUE BUREAU, Respondent
Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court ORDER PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 12th day of August, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.