From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. CDCR

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 29, 2021
1:21-cv-01514-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-01514-SAB (PC)

11-29-2021

DAVID ROBERTS, Plaintiff, v. CDCR, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED (ECF No. 22)

Plaintiff David Roberts is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On October 15, 2021, the Court screened Plaintiff first amended complaint, found that no cognizable claims were stated, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file a third amended complaint. (ECF No. 22.) Plaintiff has failed to respond to the Court's order and the time to do so has expired.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Within fourteen days from the date of service of this order Plaintiff shall show cause why the action should not be dismissed; and
2. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation for dismissal of the action for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief, failure to comply with a court order and failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Roberts v. CDCR

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 29, 2021
1:21-cv-01514-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Roberts v. CDCR

Case Details

Full title:DAVID ROBERTS, Plaintiff, v. CDCR, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 29, 2021

Citations

1:21-cv-01514-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2021)