From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ROBERTS v. CATE

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 26, 2011
No. 2:08-cv-2624 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:08-cv-2624 KJN P.

January 26, 2011


ORDER


On December 22, 2010, defendants filed a request for an order to take deposition by remote means. On December 28, 2010, the court issued an order setting a schedule for briefing on the request. Twenty-one days have passed, and plaintiff has not filed an opposition or otherwise responded to the request. Good cause appearing, defendants' request to take the deposition of plaintiff by remote means via videoconference is granted. Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(b)(4).

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants' December 22, 2010 request (dkt. no. 37) is granted. Defendants are permitted to take plaintiff's deposition remotely by videoconference.

DATED: January 25, 2011


Summaries of

ROBERTS v. CATE

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 26, 2011
No. 2:08-cv-2624 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2011)
Case details for

ROBERTS v. CATE

Case Details

Full title:TONY ROBERTS, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW CATE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 26, 2011

Citations

No. 2:08-cv-2624 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2011)