From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. Cate

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Aug 20, 2012
2:08-cv-2624 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2012)

Opinion


TONY ROBERTS, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW CATE, et al., Defendants. No. 2:08-cv-2624 JAM KJN P United States District Court, E.D. California. August 20, 2012

          ORDER

          KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. On May 1, 2012, the court issued a further scheduling order. However, on June 6, 2012, defendants were granted leave to file a motion for summary judgment, and on July 19, 2012, briefing on the motion was extended in accordance with Woods v. Carey, 2012 WL 2626912 (9th Cir. July 6, 2012). Accordingly, the revised briefing deadlines set in the May 1, 2012 further scheduling order are vacated, and will be reset upon resolution of the pending motion for summary judgment.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. The May 1, 2012 further scheduling order is vacated;

         2. Discovery and law and motion remain closed; and

         3. The jury trial set for February 11, 2013, at 9:00 a.m., before the Honorable John A. Mendez is vacated.


Summaries of

Roberts v. Cate

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Aug 20, 2012
2:08-cv-2624 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Roberts v. Cate

Case Details

Full title:TONY ROBERTS, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW CATE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 20, 2012

Citations

2:08-cv-2624 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2012)