From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. Careflite

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Apr 21, 2011
No. 02-11-00062-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 21, 2011)

Opinion

No. 02-11-00062-CV

Delivered: April 21, 2011.

Appealed from the 348th District Court of Tarrant County.

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT


On March 23, 2011, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal had informed this court that arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk's record as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2). We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant, within fifteen days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk's record and provided this court with proof of payment.

Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk's record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.


Summaries of

Roberts v. Careflite

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Apr 21, 2011
No. 02-11-00062-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 21, 2011)
Case details for

Roberts v. Careflite

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE E. ROBERTS, APPELLANT v. CAREFLITE, APPELLEE

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Apr 21, 2011

Citations

No. 02-11-00062-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 21, 2011)