From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. California

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 1, 2022
2:21-CV-2395-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-CV-2395-DMC-P

02-01-2022

DAVID ROBERTS, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The alleged civil rights violations took place at Kern Valley State Prison, Corcoran State Prison, and “Delano Hospital, ” which is within the boundaries of the Fresno division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(b). Pursuant to Local Rule 120(d), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper division of the Court may, on the Court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division. Because the Sacramento division of this Court is not the proper division, this action will be transferred to the Fresno division.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno.


Summaries of

Roberts v. California

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 1, 2022
2:21-CV-2395-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2022)
Case details for

Roberts v. California

Case Details

Full title:DAVID ROBERTS, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Feb 1, 2022

Citations

2:21-CV-2395-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2022)

Citing Cases

Roberts v. California

Court records reflect that plaintiff has filed a complaint in this district that is nearly identical to the…