From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. Caldwell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 10, 2005
23 A.D.3d 210 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

7031.

November 10, 2005.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Sallie Manzanet, J.), entered September 30, 2004, which granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment as to liability on his Labor Law § 240 (1) claim, and denied defendant's cross motion for summary judgment insofar as it sought dismissal of plaintiff's Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6) claims, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Arthur Lawrence Alexander, New York, for appellant.

Trief Olk, New York (Barbara E. Olk of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Buckley, P.J., Tom, Andrias, Sullivan and Malone, JJ., concur.


There is no dispute that plaintiff, while engaged in performing contracted-for renovations and alterations on defendant's premises, fell from an inadequately secured ladder. While plaintiff may not have been performing his assigned duties at the time of the accident, he was helping coworkers with other renovation related work on defendant's premises, and thus should not be deprived of the protection of Labor Law § 240 (1) or § 241 (6) ( see Calaway v. Metro Roofing Sheet Metal Works, 284 AD2d 285; Reeves v. Red Wing Co., 139 AD2d 935).

We have reviewed defendant's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Roberts v. Caldwell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 10, 2005
23 A.D.3d 210 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Roberts v. Caldwell

Case Details

Full title:RONALD ROBERTS, Respondent, v. SYLVIA CALDWELL, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 10, 2005

Citations

23 A.D.3d 210 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 8607
806 N.Y.S.2d 8

Citing Cases

Young v. Retail Project Mgmt.

Labor Law § 241(6) covers injuries sustained in the context of or in connection with construction or during…

Padilla v. Absolute Realty, Inc.

In opposition, defendant site owner Absolute failed to raise an issue of fact. Any conflicting testimony as…