From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Dec 21, 2011
3:10-CV-44 6-AC (D. Or. Dec. 21, 2011)

Opinion

3:10-CV-44 6-AC

12-21-2011

THOMAS M. ROBERTS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

DAVID B. LOWRY 9900 S.W. Greenburg Road, Attorney for Plaintiff S. AMANDA MARSHALL United States Attorney ADRIAN L. BROWN Assistant United States Attorney DAVID MORADO Regional Chief Counsel BENJAMIN J. GROEBNER Special Assistant United States Attorney Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration Attorneys for Defendant


ORDER

DAVID B. LOWRY

9900 S.W. Greenburg Road,

Attorney for Plaintiff

S. AMANDA MARSHALL

United States Attorney

ADRIAN L. BROWN

Assistant United States Attorney

DAVID MORADO

Regional Chief Counsel

BENJAMIN J. GROEBNER

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Office of the General Counsel

Social Security Administration

Attorneys for Defendant

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued Findings and Recommendation (#20) on October 11, 2011, in which he recommends this Court should affirm the decision of the Commissioner that Plaintiff is not disabled and is not entitled to benefits.

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983)(rev'd on other grounds). See also Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation (#20). Accordingly, the Court AFFIRMS the decision of the Commissioner and DISMISSES this matter with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Roberts v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Dec 21, 2011
3:10-CV-44 6-AC (D. Or. Dec. 21, 2011)
Case details for

Roberts v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS M. ROBERTS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Date published: Dec 21, 2011

Citations

3:10-CV-44 6-AC (D. Or. Dec. 21, 2011)