From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE at WINCHESTER
Jun 5, 2013
Case No. 4:12-cv-24 (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 5, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 4:12-cv-24

06-05-2013

RUSSELL LEE ROBERTS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL S. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


Judge Mattice

Magistrate Judge Lee


ORDER

On March 1, 2013, United States Magistrate Judge Susan K. Lee filed her Report and Recommendation (Doc. 20) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Magistrate Judge Lee recommended that (1) Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 15) be denied; (2) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 17) be granted; (3) the Decision of the Commissioner be affirmed; and (4) this action be dismissed.

Plaintiff has filed no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation as well as the record, and it agrees with Magistrate Judge Lee's well-reasoned conclusions.

Accordingly:

• The Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Lee's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations pursuant to § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72(b);
• Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 15) is DENIED;
• Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 17) is GRANTED;
• The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED; and
• This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

______________

HARRY S. MATTICE, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Roberts v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE at WINCHESTER
Jun 5, 2013
Case No. 4:12-cv-24 (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 5, 2013)
Case details for

Roberts v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:RUSSELL LEE ROBERTS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL S. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE at WINCHESTER

Date published: Jun 5, 2013

Citations

Case No. 4:12-cv-24 (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 5, 2013)