From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts-Horsfield v. Gedicks

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 25, 1924
96 N.J. Eq. 384 (N.J. 1924)

Opinion

Filed April 25th, 1924.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery, advised by Vice-Chancellor Backes, whose opinion is reported in 94 N.J. Eq. 82.

Mr. William Newcorn, for the appellant.

Mr. Joseph T. Hague, for the respondents.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, McGLENNON — 13.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Roberts-Horsfield v. Gedicks

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 25, 1924
96 N.J. Eq. 384 (N.J. 1924)
Case details for

Roberts-Horsfield v. Gedicks

Case Details

Full title:FRANCES E. ROBERTS-HORSFIELD et al., respondents, v. CECELIA GRACE…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Apr 25, 1924

Citations

96 N.J. Eq. 384 (N.J. 1924)

Citing Cases

Sommers v. Zuck

Such a parol gift, however, must be proved by clear and unequivocal evidence. See Roberts-Horsfield v.…

Myers v. Vogt

As against his wife's heirs-at-law I think complainant not entitled to a decree which, in its practical…