From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts-Gordon Appliance v. M. Parisi Son

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 11, 1983
96 A.D.2d 719 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

July 11, 1983

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Cook, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Hancock, Jr., Doerr, Boomer and Moule, JJ.


Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff's documentary and other proof demonstrated its entitlement to summary judgment. It then became defendant's burden to demonstrate by admissible evidence the existence of a factual issue requiring a trial (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557). Defendant failed to do so and Special Term properly granted summary judgment. The affidavit submitted by defendant's employee contains nonspecific and conclusory averments which do not refute the documentary proof submitted by plaintiff.


Summaries of

Roberts-Gordon Appliance v. M. Parisi Son

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 11, 1983
96 A.D.2d 719 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

Roberts-Gordon Appliance v. M. Parisi Son

Case Details

Full title:ROBERTS-GORDON APPLIANCE CORP., Respondent, v. M. PARISI SON CONSTRUCTION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 11, 1983

Citations

96 A.D.2d 719 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)