Opinion
12-12-2017
ROBERT S., Respondent, v. LINDA S., Appellant; Richard B. Alderman, et al., Respondents. (And Two Other Related Matters.)
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the July 2014 Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie, appellant having previously moved in the Court of Appeals for leave to appeal (24 N.Y.3d 906 [2014] ) from the same Appellate Division order from which she currently seeks leave to appeal (see Selinger v. Selinger, 90 N.Y.2d 842, 660 N.Y.S.2d 709, 683 N.E.2d 331 [1997] ); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the July 2017 Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the remaining orders, otherwise dismissed for failure to demonstrate timeliness as required by Rules of the Court of Appeals (see 22 NYCRR 500.22 [b][2] ).
Judge Stein took no part.