Robert Kimball Ins. Co. v. Sunz Ins. Co.

Full title: ROBERT KIMBALL INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. SUNZ INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

Date published: Aug 28, 2019

278 So. 3d 305 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 2D19-390

08-28-2019

ROBERT KIMBALL INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. SUNZ INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

Michael Krouse of Krouse Law Firm, Lakewood Ranch, for Petitioner. Katherine E. Giddings of Akerman, LLP, Tallahassee; Jason L. Margolin of Akerman, LLP, Tampa; Jason S. Oletsky of Akerman, LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Michael Krouse of Krouse Law Firm, Lakewood Ranch, for Petitioner.

Katherine E. Giddings of Akerman, LLP, Tallahassee; Jason L. Margolin of Akerman, LLP, Tampa; Jason S. Oletsky of Akerman, LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We treat the petition for writ of certiorari challenging the trial court's subject matter jurisdiction as a petition for writ of prohibition, see Mandico v. Taos Constr., Inc., 605 So. 2d 850, 853 (Fla. 1992), and deny it accordingly.

CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.