From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robert Bosch LLC v. Snap-On Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 11, 2012
Case No. 12-11503 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 11, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 12-11503

12-11-2012

ROBERT BOSCH LLC, Plaintiff, v. SNAP-ON INC. and DREW TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendants.


ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANTS'

RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY

AND CROSS MOTION TO COMPEL

Plaintiff moved to compel discovery on November 15, 2012. Defendants filed a combined response and cross motion to compel Plaintiff to disclose its infringement contentions. The court's practice guidelines state that "[u]nder no circumstances may a motion be included within or tacked onto a response or a reply." Accordingly,

Practice Guidelines for Judge Robert H. Cleland, Motion Practice, http:// www.mied.uscourts.gov/ Judges/ guidelines/ topic.cfm?topic_id=69 (last visited Dec. 10, 2012).

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' response and cross motion to compel [Dkts. # 35, 36, & 37] are STRICKEN without prejudice. Defendants are DIRECTED to file an amended response to Plaintiff's motion to compel discovery [Dkt. # 33] by December 18, 2012.

_____________

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this date, December 11, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

Lisa Wagner

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522


Summaries of

Robert Bosch LLC v. Snap-On Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 11, 2012
Case No. 12-11503 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Robert Bosch LLC v. Snap-On Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT BOSCH LLC, Plaintiff, v. SNAP-ON INC. and DREW TECHNOLOGIES, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 11, 2012

Citations

Case No. 12-11503 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 11, 2012)