In Robert L., the Court of Appeal had held that section 186.22 did not describe a substantive offense but describes criminal penalties for certain offenses promoting a criminal street gang.
Summary of this case from People v. ArroyasG027381
Filed July 27, 2001 REVIEW GRANTED
In Robert L., the Court of Appeal had held that section 186.22 did not describe a substantive offense but describes criminal penalties for certain offenses promoting a criminal street gang.
Summary of this case from People v. ArroyasFull title:ROBERT ANTHONY L., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY…
Court:Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District, Division Three
Date published: Jul 27, 2001
Superior Court of Orange County, No. J-1764-765, Gregory W. Jones, Temporary Judge, Judge, Ct.App. 4/3…
Robert Anthony L. v. Superior CourtFiled March 8, 2001 REHEARING GRANTED See 90 Cal.App.4th 1414 for subsequent…