From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 19, 1992
596 So. 2d 1250 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 91-1054.

April 15, 1992. Rehearing Denied May 19, 1992.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Leroy H. Moe, J.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Paul E. Petillo, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Johnnie Roberson has appealed from his convictions and sentences for attempted second degree murder with a firearm and aggravated battery with a firearm. We have considered all of his contentions and have concluded that only one has merit. In sentencing the defendant to consecutive sentences of twenty and fifteen years, the trial judge exceeded the permitted range of seven to twenty-two years without stating written reasons for departure. We find no merit in the state's argument that the judge did not know he was imposing a guidelines departure sentence. Therefore, upon remand the trial court must sentence the defendant to a term within the guidelines permitted range. Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla. 1990).

Accordingly, we affirm Roberson's convictions but reverse the sentences and remand for resentencing within the guidelines.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and GARRETT, J., concur.


Summaries of

Roberson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 19, 1992
596 So. 2d 1250 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Roberson v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHNNIE ROBERSON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 19, 1992

Citations

596 So. 2d 1250 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

Cunningham v. State

PER CURIAM. We affirm appellant's convictions but remand with directions that appellant's sentence on…