From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberson v. Rackley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 5, 2016
Case No. LA CV 15-4356 VAP (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. LA CV 15-4356 VAP (JCG)

12-05-2016

PAUL ROBERSON, JR., Petitioner, v. RONALD RACKLEY, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), and the remaining record, and has made a de novo determination. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted;

2. Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice; and

3. The Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties.

Additionally, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253; Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003). Thus, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. DATED: December 5, 2016

/s/_________

HON. VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT

JUDGE


Summaries of

Roberson v. Rackley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 5, 2016
Case No. LA CV 15-4356 VAP (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2016)
Case details for

Roberson v. Rackley

Case Details

Full title:PAUL ROBERSON, JR., Petitioner, v. RONALD RACKLEY, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 5, 2016

Citations

Case No. LA CV 15-4356 VAP (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2016)