From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robbins v. Robbins

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 21, 1988
526 So. 2d 1053 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 88-950.

June 21, 1988.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Jack M. Turner, J.

Rose H. Robbins, in pro per.

Emilia Diaz-Fox, Miami, for appellee.

Before HUBBART, DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.


The order under review which transferred to Broward County this action to modify a 1984 final judgment of dissolution solely because the dissolution was entered in Broward County is reversed upon a holding that (1) under Section 61.14(1), Florida Statutes (1987), the appellant-wife, being, without dispute, a long-term resident of Dade County when she filed her modification action, was entitled to bring the action in the county of her residence, notwithstanding that venue was also proper in the county where the order sought to be modified was entered, Torres v. Torres, 516 So.2d 11 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Carr v. Carr, 489 So.2d 889 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Sikes v. Sikes, 286 So.2d 210 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973); Stewart v. Carr, 218 So.2d 525 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969); and (2) apart from the showing that the dissolution was entered in Broward County, where the appellee-husband resides — facts legally insufficient to defeat the wife's choice of Dade County as the venue for her motion to modify — there are no other facts shown on this record to establish that Dade County is, as urged by the husband, a forum non conveniens.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Robbins v. Robbins

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 21, 1988
526 So. 2d 1053 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Robbins v. Robbins

Case Details

Full title:ROSE H. ROBBINS, APPELLANT, v. ALBERT F. ROBBINS, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 21, 1988

Citations

526 So. 2d 1053 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Bryant v. Bryant

Existing caselaw also supports appellant's argument with regard to her modification action. See Robbins v.…