From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robbins v. Cook

Supreme Court of Utah
Apr 28, 1987
737 P.2d 225 (Utah 1987)

Opinion

No. 860367.

April 28, 1987.

Appeal from the Third District Court, J. Dennis Frederick, J.

William Jay Robbins, pro se.

David L. Wilkinson, Atty. Gen., Sandra Sjogren, Salt Lake City, Utah, for defendants.


Petitioner appeals from the dismissal of his second petition for a writ of habeas corpus. This Court affirmed defendant's conviction in State v. Robbins, 709 P.2d 771 (Utah 1985), and affirmed denial of his first petition for a writ of habeas corpus in Robbins v. Cook, 734 P.2d 415 (Utah 1986).

Petitioner claims defects in the warrant for his arrest and in the charging information. These claims were waived when they were not brought to the attention of the trial court prior to the trial. State v. Schreuder, 712 P.2d 264 (Utah 1985); State v. Smith, 700 P.2d 1106 (Utah 1985); State v. Lairby, 699 P.2d 1187 (Utah 1984). In addition, petitioner cannot raise issues in post-conviction proceedings which could or should have been brought on direct appeal, except in unusual circumstances. Codianna v. Morris, 660 P.2d 1101 (Utah 1983). No such unusual circumstances are presented in this appeal. Affirmed.


Summaries of

Robbins v. Cook

Supreme Court of Utah
Apr 28, 1987
737 P.2d 225 (Utah 1987)
Case details for

Robbins v. Cook

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM JAY ROBBINS, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, v. GERALD L. COOK, WARDEN…

Court:Supreme Court of Utah

Date published: Apr 28, 1987

Citations

737 P.2d 225 (Utah 1987)

Citing Cases

Wulffenstein v. Morris

We do not reach the merits of Wulffenstein's appeal. A petitioner cannot raise issues in postconviction…

Sherratt v. Friel

Moreover, "defects . . . in the charging information . . . were waived when they were not brought to the…