From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roarty-Nugent v. Cuyahoga Cnty.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Nov 29, 2021
1:20-cv-01025 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 29, 2021)

Opinion

1:20-cv-01025

11-29-2021

MICHAEL ROARTY-NUGENT, Plaintiff, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY, et al., Defendants.


David A. Ruiz, Magistrate Judge

OPINION AND ORDER

J. Philip Calabrese, United States District Judge

Plaintiff Michael Roarty-Nugent moves for clarification of the discovery deadline set for December 10, 2021. (ECF No. 43.) Plaintiff seeks clarification because the Court ordered that all “non-Monell fact discovery shall be completed by 12/10/2021.” (Dkt., Oct. 4, 2021.) He asks that the deadline pertain only to the claims against the individual Officers Smith, Boardman, and Graham. (ECF No. 43, PageID #631.) The arrangement he seeks is consistent with the parties' agreement for bifurcating discovery, set forth in the parties' joint status report dated June 16, 2021. (ECF No. 37, PageID #598.) Defendants do not oppose the motion.

Based on the parties' agreement and the reasons stated in Plaintiff's motion, and because the motion is unopposed, the Court GRANTS the motion. The discovery deadline of December 10, 2021 shall pertain only to the claims against the individual corrections officers. The deadline does not apply to the non-Monell claims against other Defendants.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Roarty-Nugent v. Cuyahoga Cnty.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Nov 29, 2021
1:20-cv-01025 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Roarty-Nugent v. Cuyahoga Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL ROARTY-NUGENT, Plaintiff, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Nov 29, 2021

Citations

1:20-cv-01025 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 29, 2021)