From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roark v. Marshall

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 22, 2010
No. CIV S-07-1338 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 22, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-1338 LKK DAD P.

July 22, 2010


ORDER


On July 15, 2010, petitioner filed a motion for extension of time and appointment of counsel (Doc. No. 62). On May 10, 2010, the assigned district judge issued an order adopting the findings and recommendations recommending that petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be denied. Judgment was entered in this action on that same date and this case was closed. Accordingly, documents filed by petitioner since the closing date of this action will be disregarded and no orders will issue in response to future filings.


Summaries of

Roark v. Marshall

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 22, 2010
No. CIV S-07-1338 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 22, 2010)
Case details for

Roark v. Marshall

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT L. ROARK, Petitioner, v. JOHN MARSHALL, Warden, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 22, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-07-1338 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 22, 2010)