From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roark v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION AT PIKEVILLE
Apr 12, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-125-DLB (E.D. Ky. Apr. 12, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-125-DLB

04-12-2018

MARK ROARK PLAINTIFF v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration DEFENDANT


MEMORANDUM ORDER

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiff Mark Roark's Motion for Attorney's Fees and Costs. (Doc. # 14). The Commissioner having filed her Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fees (Doc. # 15), this matter is now ripe for the Court's review. For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiff's Motion is hereby granted.

The Plaintiff filed his Complaint in this matter on July 19, 2017, seeking reversal of the Commissioner's denial of his claim for Disability Insurance Benefits ("DIB"). (Doc. # 1). On January 25, 2018, after the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment, the Court entered judgment in favor of the Plaintiff and remanded the action to the Commissioner pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Docs. # 12 and 13).

Now, the Plaintiff, through counsel, has filed a Motion for Attorney's Fees, and a supporting affidavit, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"). (Docs. # 14 and 14-1). Specifically, Plaintiff requests an attorney's fee award in the amount of $1,625.00 for his attorney's work and $400.00 for costs. The Commissioner does not oppose awarding Plaintiff the requested sums in attorney's fees and costs. (Doc. # 15). However, the Commissioner requests that the Court's Order awarding attorney's fees require that the award be payable to Plaintiff, not Plaintiff's attorney, pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). Id.

Accordingly, the Court having reviewed and considered the parties' filings,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Mark Roark's Motion for Attorney's Fees (Doc. # 14) is hereby GRANTED, and Plaintiff is awarded attorney's fees in the amount of $1,625.00 for his attorney's work and $400.00 for costs, in accordance with the EAJA and Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010).

This 12th day of April, 2018.

Signed By:

David L . Bunning

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Roark v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION AT PIKEVILLE
Apr 12, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-125-DLB (E.D. Ky. Apr. 12, 2018)
Case details for

Roark v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:MARK ROARK PLAINTIFF v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Commissioner of the Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION AT PIKEVILLE

Date published: Apr 12, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-125-DLB (E.D. Ky. Apr. 12, 2018)