From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roaquin v. Shinseki

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 27, 2013
2012-7049 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 27, 2013)

Opinion

2012-7049

02-27-2013

VICTORIA A. ROAQUIN, Claimant-Appellant, v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in case no. 10-2917, Judge John J. Farley, III.

ON MOTION


ORDER

The court construes Victoria A. Roaquin's filing as a motion to obtain counsel.

This court has no procedure to appoint counsel for pro se litigants. Mrs. Roaquin is advised that pro bono counsel may be available to veterans for representation at this court through various assistance programs, including the Federal Circuit Bar Association's Veterans Pro Bono Program.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted to the extent that Mrs. Roaquin is given 60 days from the date of this order to obtain counsel. If no counsel is obtained the case will proceed as per the court's normal schedule.

FOR THE COURT

________________________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk
s26


Summaries of

Roaquin v. Shinseki

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 27, 2013
2012-7049 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Roaquin v. Shinseki

Case Details

Full title:VICTORIA A. ROAQUIN, Claimant-Appellant, v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Feb 27, 2013

Citations

2012-7049 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 27, 2013)