Roadway Exp., Inc. v. Teamsters Local 515

2 Citing cases

  1. Alabama Catalog Sales v. Harris

    794 So. 2d 312 (Ala. 2001)

    "The unenforceability of the contract extends to the contract's arbitration clause, so there exists no enforceable agreement between the parties to arbitrate disputes. `[T]he question of arbitrability is an issue for judicial determination. . . .' Roadway Express, Inc. v. Teamsters Local 515, 642 F. Supp. 116, 118 (N.D.Ga. 1986) (citations omitted). In any case, `arbitration is a matter of contract and a party cannot be required to submit to arbitration any dispute which he has not agreed so to submit.

  2. Camaro Trading v. Nissei Sangyo America

    577 So. 2d 1274 (Ala. 1991)   Cited 6 times
    In Camaro Trading, we adopted the reasoning of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia in A.J. Taft Coal Co. v. S H Contractors, Inc. [Ms. 1-88-CV-436-MHS, October 4, 1988] (N.D.Ga. 1988) (not reported in F. Supp.), aff'd on other grounds, 906 F.2d 1507 (11th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1026 (1991).

    "The unenforceability of the contract extends to the contract's arbitration clause, so there exists no enforceable agreement between the parties to arbitrate disputes. '[T]he question of arbitrability is an issue for judicial determination. . . .' Roadway Express, Inc. v. Teamsters Local 515, 642 F. Supp. 116, 118 (N.D.Ga. 1986) (citations omitted). In any case, 'arbitration is a matter of contract and a party cannot be required to submit to arbitration any dispute which he has not agreed so to submit.