From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roach v. Dominguez

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jul 8, 2024
4:23-cv-01062-LPR (E.D. Ark. Jul. 8, 2024)

Opinion

4:23-cv-01062-LPR

07-08-2024

GEORGE LEE ROACH #502169 PLAINTIFF v. ZEUS DOMINGUEZ, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

LEE P. RUDOFSKY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition (RD) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Doc. 7). No objections have been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. After a de novo review of the RD, along with careful consideration of the entire case record, the Court hereby approves and adopts the RD in its entirety as this Court's findings and conclusions in all respects.

Accordingly, Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Court recommends that dismissal of this case count as a “strike,” in the future, for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order or the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Roach v. Dominguez

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jul 8, 2024
4:23-cv-01062-LPR (E.D. Ark. Jul. 8, 2024)
Case details for

Roach v. Dominguez

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE LEE ROACH #502169 PLAINTIFF v. ZEUS DOMINGUEZ, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Jul 8, 2024

Citations

4:23-cv-01062-LPR (E.D. Ark. Jul. 8, 2024)