From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roach v. Cerliano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
May 4, 2020
Case No. 6:19-CV-216-JDK-KNM (E.D. Tex. May. 4, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 6:19-CV-216-JDK-KNM

05-04-2020

RAYMOND BRADLEY ROACH, Plaintiff, v. MAXEY CERLIANO, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Raymond Bradley Roach, an inmate proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled and numbered civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On March 18, 2020, Judge Mitchell issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 15) recommending that Plaintiff's claims be dismissed as frivolous and for failure to state a claim. Id. at 4.

This Court reviews the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge de novo only if a party objects within fourteen days of service of the Report and Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In conducting a de novo review, the Court examines the entire record and makes an independent assessment under the law. Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded on other grounds by statute, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (extending the time to file objections from ten to fourteen days). Here, Plaintiff did not file objections in the prescribed period. The Court therefore reviews the Magistrate Judge's findings for clear error or abuse of discretion and reviews her legal conclusions to determine whether they are contrary to law. See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918 (1989) (holding that, if no objections to a Magistrate Judge's Report are filed, the standard of review is "clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law").

Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 15) as the findings of this Court.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report (Docket No. 15) be ADOPTED. It is further

ORDERED that the above-styled civil action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failure to state a claim as to its refiling in federal court, but without prejudice as to any claims that Plaintiff may raise in state court or through the administrative processes of the Gregg County Jail.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 4th day of May, 2020.

/s/_________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Roach v. Cerliano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
May 4, 2020
Case No. 6:19-CV-216-JDK-KNM (E.D. Tex. May. 4, 2020)
Case details for

Roach v. Cerliano

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND BRADLEY ROACH, Plaintiff, v. MAXEY CERLIANO, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Date published: May 4, 2020

Citations

Case No. 6:19-CV-216-JDK-KNM (E.D. Tex. May. 4, 2020)