From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roach v. Barcus (In re Bolen)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION
Feb 13, 2015
1:15-cv-00044 (N.D. Ind. Feb. 13, 2015)

Opinion

1:15-cv-00044

02-13-2015

IN RE: CASE NO. 13-10529 ZACHARIA DUANE BOLEN and BETHANI LEERIN HINDERLAND-BOLEN Debtors, DUSTIN M. ROACH, Plaintiff v. STEVEN E. BARCUS, KARI J. ROMEY, and DOUGLAS P. ROMEY, Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER

Defendants Kari Romey and Douglas Romey want this Court to withdraw the reference of this case to the bankruptcy court. (Docket Entry 1.) I have reviewed the motion and briefing, as well as Bankruptcy Judge Grant's recommendation that the motion for withdrawal of the reference be denied. (DE 2-1 at 6.) Judge Grant's reasoning is sound, so I will adopt his recommendation and DENY Defendants' motion to withdraw the reference. (DE 1.) Because time is of the essence in order to maintain the existing litigation schedule a fuller opinion explaining my reasoning will follow this Order.

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: February 13, 2015

/s/ Philip P. Simon

PHILIP P. SIMON, CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Roach v. Barcus (In re Bolen)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION
Feb 13, 2015
1:15-cv-00044 (N.D. Ind. Feb. 13, 2015)
Case details for

Roach v. Barcus (In re Bolen)

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: CASE NO. 13-10529 ZACHARIA DUANE BOLEN and BETHANI LEERIN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION

Date published: Feb 13, 2015

Citations

1:15-cv-00044 (N.D. Ind. Feb. 13, 2015)