From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roa v. Nissan N. Am.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Apr 29, 2024
5:22-cv-01435-SSS-DTBx (C.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2024)

Opinion

5:22-cv-01435-SSS-DTBx

04-29-2024

MARY LOU A. ROA, an individual, and PRISCILLA D. RAMIREZ, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., a Delaware Corporation, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendant.


David T. Bristow, Magistrate Judge

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

SUNSHINE S. SYKES, U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Based on the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, the stipulation is approved. The entire action, including all claims and counterclaims stated herein against all parties, is hereby ORDERED dismissed with prejudice, and the Court continues to retain jurisdiction over this action for ninety (90) days to allow the Parties to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement.

The Court further VACATES the OSC Hearing scheduled for May 3, 2024.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Roa v. Nissan N. Am.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Apr 29, 2024
5:22-cv-01435-SSS-DTBx (C.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2024)
Case details for

Roa v. Nissan N. Am.

Case Details

Full title:MARY LOU A. ROA, an individual, and PRISCILLA D. RAMIREZ, an individual…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Apr 29, 2024

Citations

5:22-cv-01435-SSS-DTBx (C.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2024)