From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

R.M. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 22, 1989
541 So. 2d 688 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 87-3014.

March 22, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Vincent E. Giglio, J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and A. Anne Owens, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Katherine V. Blanco, Tampa, for appellee.


Appellant correctly points out that his adjudication of delinquency for both armed robbery and petit theft arising from a single act is a violation of the protection against double jeopardy. See J.M. v. State, 536 So.2d 1165 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), citing Carawan v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla. 1987). We reverse the adjudication of delinquency only as it pertains to the petit theft and remand for the trial court to correct the delinquency order to so reflect.

We find no merit to appellant's other issue on appeal concerning the lack of sufficient evidence that he committed the offense of armed robbery as a principal in the first degree.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and THREADGILL, J., concur.


Summaries of

R.M. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 22, 1989
541 So. 2d 688 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

R.M. v. State

Case Details

Full title:R.M., A CHILD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Mar 22, 1989

Citations

541 So. 2d 688 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)