From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

R.M. v. State

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Mar 30, 2023
3:18-cv-05387-BHS-TLF (W.D. Wash. Mar. 30, 2023)

Opinion

3:18-cv-05387-BHS-TLF

03-30-2023

R.M., Plaintiff, v. State of Washington, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Benjamin H. Settle United States District Judge

The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Judge Theresa L. Fricke, United States Magistrate Judge, objections to the report and recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Defendants' second motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 162) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part;

(3) Defendants' motion is DENIED with respect to plaintiff's claims against defendant Edwards and defendant Kroha for failure to treat his pain;

(4) Defendants' motion is GRANTED with respect to all other claims and defendants. All claims against defendants Edwards and Kroha except claims for failure to treat plaintiff's pain, and all claims against all remaining defendants, are DISMISSED with prejudice.

(5) Plaintiff may maintain his in forma pauperis status in the event of an appeal.


Summaries of

R.M. v. State

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Mar 30, 2023
3:18-cv-05387-BHS-TLF (W.D. Wash. Mar. 30, 2023)
Case details for

R.M. v. State

Case Details

Full title:R.M., Plaintiff, v. State of Washington, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Mar 30, 2023

Citations

3:18-cv-05387-BHS-TLF (W.D. Wash. Mar. 30, 2023)