From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

R.L.W. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 26, 1985
467 So. 2d 828 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

No. 84-1216.

April 26, 1985.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Pinellas County; Jack A. Page, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Douglas S. Connor, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Theda James Davis, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


The parties have agreed that the three-month minimum period of community control imposed by the trial court is improper. See § 39.11(3), Fla. Stat. (1983), and L.J.N. v. State, 411 So.2d 1349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). We strike this portion of the commitment order, but note that this question apparently is moot due to the passage of time.

This case is otherwise AFFIRMED.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and OTT and DANAHY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

R.L.W. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 26, 1985
467 So. 2d 828 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

R.L.W. v. State

Case Details

Full title:R.L.W., A CHILD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Apr 26, 1985

Citations

467 So. 2d 828 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

K.W.G. v. State

We construe it as a prohibited mandatory minimum commitment with HRS. See L.J.N. v. State, 411 So.2d 1349…