R.K.M. v. Mayorkas

Full title: R. K. M., Plaintiff, v. ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Nov 7, 2024

2:24-cv-01077-RSL (W.D. Wash. Nov. 7, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-01077-RSL

11-07-2024

R. K. M., Plaintiff, v. ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, et al., Defendants.

TESSA M. GORMAN United States Attorney MICHELLE R. LAMBERT, NYS #4666657 Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendants O'SULLIVAN LAW OFFICE, JANE MARIE O' SULLIVAN, WSBA #34486 Attorney for Plaintiff

ROBERT S. LASNIK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

TESSA M. GORMAN United States Attorney

MICHELLE R. LAMBERT, NYS #4666657 Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendants

O'SULLIVAN LAW OFFICE, JANE MARIE O' SULLIVAN, WSBA #34486 Attorney for Plaintiff

STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS AND ORDER

ROBERT S. LASNIK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), the parties stipulate to the dismissal of this case without prejudice, with each party to bear their own costs. Plaintiff brought this litigation pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act and Mandamus Act seeking, inter alia, to compel U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) to adjudicate her Form I-589, Application for Asylum and for Withholding of Removal. USCIS has adjudicated the Form I-589 and this case is now moot.

I certify that this memorandum contains 76 words, in compliance with the Local Civil Rules

ORDER

It is so ORDERED. The case is dismissed without prejudice.