From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

R.J. v. Guardian Ad Litem Program

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Oct 30, 2008
993 So. 2d 176 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. 5D07-3959.

October 30, 2008.

Non Final Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County, S. Sue Robbins, Judge.

Carl S. New, Ocala, for Appellant, R.J.

Susan W. Fox, of Fox Loquasto, P.A., Tampa, and Michael H. Hopkins, Wildwood, for Appellant Department of Children and Families.

Wendie Michelle Cooper, Orlando, for Appellee.


R.J. and the Department of Children and Families filed a notice of appeal seeking to challenge a non-final order changing the placement of R.J.'s son. Because there is no rule authorizing the direct appeal of this type of non-final order in a termination of parental rights case, see Guardian Ad Litem Program v. Department of Children and Families, 972 So.2d 871 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007), we treat the matter as a certiorari proceeding. In this case, the trial court found that the placement would be in the child's best interest, see section 39.522(1), Florida Statutes (2007), and the evidence supports the trial court's factual findings. Accordingly, we deny certiorari.

DENIED.

PALMER, C.J., LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

R.J. v. Guardian Ad Litem Program

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Oct 30, 2008
993 So. 2d 176 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

R.J. v. Guardian Ad Litem Program

Case Details

Full title:R.J., Father of D.J., a Child, et al., Appellant, v. GUARDIAN AD LITEM…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Oct 30, 2008

Citations

993 So. 2d 176 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Citing Cases

Guardian v. R.A

The trial court should not have granted the motion without a determination, based upon the evidence…