From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rizzuto v. State of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 10, 1944
267 App. Div. 1025 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)

Opinion

May 10, 1944.

Appeal from Court of Claims.


The claim is for damages for the increased cost of certain work done and materials furnished under a State highway contract. Prior to calling for bids the State had designated the center line of the new highway, which ran through wooded and mountainous territory, by its usual method of strips of red cloth tied to trees and shrubs along said line. Claimants examined the site of the work before submitting their bids by following the proposed center line as thus indicated by the State. After claimants had begun work on the job and had cleared a portion of the site, it was discovered that the line previously indicated by the State was incorrect. Claimants were then compelled to proceed with their work along the correct line. The State concedes the error in designating the center line. The items of damage consist of clearing the site along the correct center line, the cost of excavating additional rock, excess cost of blasting and extra cost in placing fill. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.


Summaries of

Rizzuto v. State of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 10, 1944
267 App. Div. 1025 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)
Case details for

Rizzuto v. State of New York

Case Details

Full title:PAUL RIZZUTO et al., Doing Business as PARLOR CITY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 10, 1944

Citations

267 App. Div. 1025 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)