From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rizzi v. Scarsdale Leasing Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 29, 1996
223 A.D.2d 696 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

January 29, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ingrassia, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

On December 10, 1989, the infant plaintiff Jaime Rizzi, who was then 13 years old, and her six-year-old sister were visiting their friend, the defendant Salvatore Altieri, who was 11 years old. The youngsters took some golf clubs and golf balls from the Altieri house and went about 20 to 30 feet onto the golf course of the defendants Scarsdale Leasing Corp. and Scarsdale Golf Club, Inc. (hereinafter the Scarsdale defendants), which abutted the Altieri yard. The three children had gained access to the golf course by going through a hole in the chainlink fence that separated the golf course from the abutting properties. When Salvatore hit his ball, he hit the infant plaintiff in the eye with the club on the follow through of his swing. The plaintiffs sued the Scardsale defendants, and the Supreme Court granted the motion of those defendants for summary judgment.

The plaintiffs contend that the negligence of the Scarsdale defendants in failing to repair the hole in the fence was a proximate cause of the infant plaintiff's injuries. We disagree. Even if we assume that the Scarsdale defendants were negligent in maintaining the fence, there is no causal connection between the alleged breach of duty by those defendants and the injury which Salvatore caused the infant plaintiff.

It is firmly established that "[a]n intervening act will be deemed a superseding cause and will serve to relieve [the] defendant of liability when the act is of such an extraordinary nature or so attenuates [the] defendants' negligence from the ultimate injury that responsibility for the injury may not be reasonably attributed to the defendant" ( Kush v City of Buffalo, 59 N.Y.2d 26, 33). In this case, any failure to repair the fence, as a matter of law, was not a proximate cause of the infant plaintiff's injuries ( see, Elardo v Town of Oyster Bay, 176 A.D.2d 912; Hessner v Laporte, 171 A.D.2d 999; O'Britis v Peninsula Golf Course, 143 A.D.2d 123). Rosenblatt, J.P., Hart, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rizzi v. Scarsdale Leasing Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 29, 1996
223 A.D.2d 696 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Rizzi v. Scarsdale Leasing Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JAIME RIZZI, an Infant, by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, LORRI RIZZI…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 29, 1996

Citations

223 A.D.2d 696 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
637 N.Y.S.2d 470

Citing Cases

Williams v. New York City

To be actionable, "the negligence complained of must have caused the occurrence of the accident from which…

Lee v. Nycha

This Court held that the sole proximate cause of plaintiff's injuries was her placing a heavy, unsecured door…