From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rizk v. Mayorkas

United States District Court, D. New Jersey, Camden Vicinage
Jun 1, 2023
Civ. 22-5692 (RMB) (D.N.J. Jun. 1, 2023)

Opinion

Civ. 22-5692 (RMB)

06-01-2023

WISAM RIZK, Plaintiff. v. ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ORDER

RENEE MARIE BUMB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

IT APPEARING THAT:

1. Plaintiff submitted a letter request for access to a PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records] account, and for permission to electronically file documents in the Court. (ECF No. 17-4.)

2. Local Civil Rule 5.2(4) provides that “[a] party who is not represented by counsel must file documents with the Clerk as a Paper Filing.” Only pro se parties who are not incarcerated are eligible for access to receive documents from the Court electronically. Id. Finally, this Court does not manage PACER accounts.Therefore, Petitioner's request will be DENIED.

Information about PACER, is available at https://pacer.uscourts.gov/

IT IS therefore on this 1st day of June 2023 ,

ORDERED that Plaintiff's letter request for filing or receiving electronic documents from the Court is DENIED; and Plaintiff's request for PACER account access is DENIED (Docket No. 17-4); and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order on Plaintiff by regular U.S. mail.


Summaries of

Rizk v. Mayorkas

United States District Court, D. New Jersey, Camden Vicinage
Jun 1, 2023
Civ. 22-5692 (RMB) (D.N.J. Jun. 1, 2023)
Case details for

Rizk v. Mayorkas

Case Details

Full title:WISAM RIZK, Plaintiff. v. ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey, Camden Vicinage

Date published: Jun 1, 2023

Citations

Civ. 22-5692 (RMB) (D.N.J. Jun. 1, 2023)