From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rivers v. S.C.I. Huntingdon Prison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 29, 2013
CIVIL NO. 1:12-CV-2620 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 29, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 1:12-CV-2620

04-29-2013

FREDERICK RIVERS, Plaintiff v. S.C.I. HUNTINGDON PRISON, et al., Defendants


ORDER

AND NOW, this 29th day of April, 2013, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of Magistrate Judge Schwab (Doc. 18), to which no objections have been filed, and upon independent review of the record, the court finds no error in the R&R and concludes that the R&R should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. The R&R (Doc. 3) is ADOPTED.
2. Pursuant to the magistrate judge's recommendation, the amended complaint is DISMISSED, and the Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

________

William W. Caldwell

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Rivers v. S.C.I. Huntingdon Prison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 29, 2013
CIVIL NO. 1:12-CV-2620 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 29, 2013)
Case details for

Rivers v. S.C.I. Huntingdon Prison

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK RIVERS, Plaintiff v. S.C.I. HUNTINGDON PRISON, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Apr 29, 2013

Citations

CIVIL NO. 1:12-CV-2620 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 29, 2013)