From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rivers v. Roszko

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 28, 2007
No. CIV S-04-2524 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-04-2524 GEB EFB P.

August 28, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff is a prisoner without counsel seeking relief for alleged civil rights violations. See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He has requested that the court appoint counsel. District courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional circumstances, the court may request counsel voluntarily to represent such a plaintiff. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). The court finds that there are no exceptional circumstances in this case.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's July 17, 2007, request for appointment of counsel is denied.


Summaries of

Rivers v. Roszko

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 28, 2007
No. CIV S-04-2524 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2007)
Case details for

Rivers v. Roszko

Case Details

Full title:DAVID C. RIVERS, Plaintiff, v. E. ROSZKO, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 28, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-04-2524 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2007)