From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rivers v. Pippen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION
Jan 14, 2013
Case No. 3:12cv480/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jan. 14, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:12cv480/LAC/EMT

01-14-2013

IZELL RIVERS, #120896 Plaintiff, v. WARDEN PIPPEN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated December 12, 2012 (doc. 8). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This cause is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

3. All pending motions are DENIED.

____________

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Rivers v. Pippen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION
Jan 14, 2013
Case No. 3:12cv480/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jan. 14, 2013)
Case details for

Rivers v. Pippen

Case Details

Full title:IZELL RIVERS, #120896 Plaintiff, v. WARDEN PIPPEN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION

Date published: Jan 14, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:12cv480/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jan. 14, 2013)