From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rivers v. Pate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
Jan 31, 2013
CASE NO. 4:12-cv-508-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Jan. 31, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 4:12-cv-508-GRJ

01-31-2013

JAMES EDWARD RIVERS, Plaintiff, v. TENA PATE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

This cause is before the Court on Plaintiff's motion for subpoena. (Doc. 11.) Plaintiff wishes to subpoena records of similarly situated inmates from the Florida Parole Commission. The Court construes this request as a motion for discovery. Until such time as the Court issues a scheduling order, any motion for discovery is premature. A scheduling order is typically entered after an answer is filed. Defendants have not yet filed an answer in this case and the deadline to do so has not passed.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

Plaintiff's motion for subpoena (Doc. 11), construed as a motion for discovery, is DENIED as premature.

DONE AND ORDERED this 31st day of January 2013.

________

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Rivers v. Pate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
Jan 31, 2013
CASE NO. 4:12-cv-508-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Jan. 31, 2013)
Case details for

Rivers v. Pate

Case Details

Full title:JAMES EDWARD RIVERS, Plaintiff, v. TENA PATE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

Date published: Jan 31, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 4:12-cv-508-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Jan. 31, 2013)