Opinion
September 26, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Gurahian, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
We find that the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in dismissing the plaintiff's complaint pursuant to CPLR 3126. The plaintiff exhibited willful and contumacious conduct in failing to comply with repeated demands for disclosure and in failing to comply with several court orders compelling full and adequate disclosure (see, Zletz v. Wetanson, 67 N.Y.2d 711, 713; Lobo Equities v. North Riv. Ins. Co., 124 A.D.2d 647; Anteri v. NRS Constr. Corp., 117 A.D.2d 696, 697-698; Brandi v Chan, 151 A.D.2d 853, 854; Henderson v. Stilwell, 116 A.D.2d 861, 862-863). Thompson, J.P., Miller, O'Brien, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.