Opinion
December 9, 1991
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Wood, J.).
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.
Laws requiring written notice of a condition before liability may arise for resulting injuries are to be strictly construed (see, Mollahan v Village of Port Washington N., 153 A.D.2d 881; Conlon v Village of Pleasantville, 146 A.D.2d 736; Barrett v City of Buffalo, 96 A.D.2d 709). New Rochelle City Charter § 127A provides that written notice of a snow or ice condition existing on a sidewalk, crosswalk, or street must be given to the Director of Public Works before the accident, and we are unpersuaded that there is any material distinction between the "exit walk" where the plaintiff alleges he fell, and the public walkways described in the City Charter. We previously have held that provisions similar to the one at bar cover any walkways over which the public has a general right of passage (see, Englehardt v Town of Hempstead, 141 A.D.2d 601). It is undisputed that no written notice relating to the "exit walk" where the plaintiff was allegedly injured was given to the defendant prior to the accident. Accordingly, summary judgment is granted to the defendant and the complaint is dismissed. Harwood, J.P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Copertino, JJ., concur.